Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
Type classes without types [pdf] : in Scheme, but might be useful to us [scribd] (readscheme.org)
10 points by sacado 6116 days ago | 2 comments


3 points by almkglor 6116 days ago | link

That's pretty much what my idea was in the "has-a vs. is-a" foolery ^^. Basically interface==type class; I just tended to avoid "type class" because the classic "class type" sounds too near it.

-----

2 points by drcode 6116 days ago | link

interesting link- thanks.

-----