Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
4 points by almkglor 6020 days ago | link | parent

> I noticed the

  > (with ((a b c d) nil)
  >     (= a (fn () ...))
  >     (= b (fn () ...))
  >     (= c (fn () ...))
  >  ...)
> idiom.

If it's an idiom, probably needs a macro for it then ^^

  (mac with-r (vars . body)
    (let vars (pair vars)
      `(let ,(map car vars) nil
         ,@(map [let (var val) _ `(= ,var ,val)] vars)
         ,@body)))
edit: as an aside, peekc doesn't seem to work properly sometimes ^^


1 point by absz 5974 days ago | link

Nice macro, but why the -? withr seems more consistent with things like withs.

-----

2 points by almkglor 5974 days ago | link

I agree. Should indeed be 'withr, and probably also define a 'givenr just for consistency

-----