Actually, especially since Arc lacks a debugger, I find it very convenient to be able to just place a pr: or pr. in front of some symbol to get an expression printed out without the behavior changing.
It could return the list (1 2), but this would mean to cons up a new list every time we use 'pr just to throw it away. Multiple return values would solve the problem. Why not add them to the language?
> How much more expensive is cons compared to multiple return values?
It depends on the GC used and on the implementation. mrvs are usually pushed on the stack, so there is no GC overhead. When I develop applications with Lisp, I notice that most of the time reducing the amount of garbage speeds up the program noticeably. It's not only a problem of consing, it's also a problem of collecting the garbage. More garabage, more collection cycles.
